Monday, November 3, 2008

Programmable logic controllers

Before the advent of solid-state logic circuits, logical control systems were designed and built exclusively around electromechanical relays. Relays are far from obsolete in modern design, but have been replaced in many of their former roles as logic-level control devices, relegated most often to those applications demanding high current and/or high voltage switching.

Systems and processes requiring "on/off" control abound in modern commerce and industry, but such control systems are rarely built from either electromechanical relays or discrete logic gates. Instead, digital computers fill the need, which may be programmed to do a variety of logical functions.

In the late 1960's an American company named Bedford Associates released a computing device they called the MODICON. As an acronym, it meant Modular Digital Controller, and later became the name of a company division devoted to the design, manufacture, and sale of these special-purpose control computers. Other engineering firms developed their own versions of this device, and it eventually came to be known in non-proprietary terms as a PLC, or Programmable Logic Controller. The purpose of a PLC was to directly replace electromechanical relays as logic elements, substituting instead a solid-state digital computer with a stored program, able to emulate the interconnection of many relays to perform certain logical tasks.

A PLC has many "input" terminals, through which it interprets "high" and "low" logical states from sensors and switches. It also has many output terminals, through which it outputs "high" and "low" signals to power lights, solenoids, contactors, small motors, and other devices lending themselves to on/off control. In an effort to make PLCs easy to program, their programming language was designed to resemble ladder logic diagrams. Thus, an industrial electrician or electrical engineer accustomed to reading ladder logic schematics would feel comfortable programming a PLC to perform the same control functions.

PLCs are industrial computers, and as such their input and output signals are typically 120 volts AC, just like the electromechanical control relays they were designed to replace. Although some PLCs have the ability to input and output low-level DC voltage signals of the magnitude used in logic gate circuits, this is the exception and not the rule.

Signal connection and programming standards vary somewhat between different models of PLC, but they are similar enough to allow a "generic" introduction to PLC programming here. The following illustration shows a simple PLC, as it might appear from a front view. Two screw terminals provide connection to 120 volts AC for powering the PLC's internal circuitry, labeled L1 and L2. Six screw terminals on the left-hand side provide connection to input devices, each terminal representing a different input "channel" with its own "X" label. The lower-left screw terminal is a "Common" connection, which is generally connected to L2 (neutral) of the 120 VAC power source.

Inside the PLC housing, connected between each input terminal and the Common terminal, is an opto-isolator device (Light-Emitting Diode) that provides an electrically isolated "high" logic signal to the computer's circuitry (a photo-transistor interprets the LED's light) when there is 120 VAC power applied between the respective input terminal and the Common terminal. An indicating LED on the front panel of the PLC gives visual indication of an "energized" input:

Output signals are generated by the PLC's computer circuitry activating a switching device (transistor, TRIAC, or even an electromechanical relay), connecting the "Source" terminal to any of the "Y-" labeled output terminals. The "Source" terminal, correspondingly, is usually connected to the L1 side of the 120 VAC power source. As with each input, an indicating LED on the front panel of the PLC gives visual indication of an "energized" output:

In this way, the PLC is able to interface with real-world devices such as switches and solenoids.

The actual logic of the control system is established inside the PLC by means of a computer program. This program dictates which output gets energized under which input conditions. Although the program itself appears to be a ladder logic diagram, with switch and relay symbols, there are no actual switch contacts or relay coils operating inside the PLC to create the logical relationships between input and output. These are imaginary contacts and coils, if you will. The program is entered and viewed via a personal computer connected to the PLC's programming port.

Consider the following circuit and PLC program:

When the pushbutton switch is unactuated (unpressed), no power is sent to the X1 input of the PLC. Following the program, which shows a normally-open X1 contact in series with a Y1 coil, no "power" will be sent to the Y1 coil. Thus, the PLC's Y1 output remains de-energized, and the indicator lamp connected to it remains dark.

If the pushbutton switch is pressed, however, power will be sent to the PLC's X1 input. Any and all X1 contacts appearing in the program will assume the actuated (non-normal) state, as though they were relay contacts actuated by the energizing of a relay coil named "X1". In this case, energizing the X1 input will cause the normally-open X1 contact will "close," sending "power" to the Y1 coil. When the Y1 coil of the program "energizes," the real Y1 output will become energized, lighting up the lamp connected to it:

It must be understood that the X1 contact, Y1 coil, connecting wires, and "power" appearing in the personal computer's display are all virtual. They do not exist as real electrical components. They exist as commands in a computer program -- a piece of software only -- that just happens to resemble a real relay schematic diagram.

Equally important to understand is that the personal computer used to display and edit the PLC's program is not necessary for the PLC's continued operation. Once a program has been loaded to the PLC from the personal computer, the personal computer may be unplugged from the PLC, and the PLC will continue to follow the programmed commands. I include the personal computer display in these illustrations for your sake only, in aiding to understand the relationship between real-life conditions (switch closure and lamp status) and the program's status ("power" through virtual contacts and virtual coils).

The true power and versatility of a PLC is revealed when we want to alter the behavior of a control system. Since the PLC is a programmable device, we can alter its behavior by changing the commands we give it, without having to reconfigure the electrical components connected to it. For example, suppose we wanted to make this switch-and-lamp circuit function in an inverted fashion: push the button to make the lamp turn off, and release it to make it turn on. The "hardware" solution would require that a normally-closed pushbutton switch be substituted for the normally-open switch currently in place. The "software" solution is much easier: just alter the program so that contact X1 is normally-closed rather than normally-open.

In the following illustration, we have the altered system shown in the state where the pushbutton is unactuated (not being pressed):

In this next illustration, the switch is shown actuated (pressed):

One of the advantages of implementing logical control in software rather than in hardware is that input signals can be re-used as many times in the program as is necessary. For example, take the following circuit and program, designed to energize the lamp if at least two of the three pushbutton switches are simultaneously actuated:

To build an equivalent circuit using electromechanical relays, three relays with two normally-open contacts each would have to be used, to provide two contacts per input switch. Using a PLC, however, we can program as many contacts as we wish for each "X" input without adding additional hardware, since each input and each output is nothing more than a single bit in the PLC's digital memory (either 0 or 1), and can be recalled as many times as necessary.

Furthermore, since each output in the PLC is nothing more than a bit in its memory as well, we can assign contacts in a PLC program "actuated" by an output (Y) status. Take for instance this next system, a motor start-stop control circuit:

The pushbutton switch connected to input X1 serves as the "Start" switch, while the switch connected to input X2 serves as the "Stop." Another contact in the program, named Y1, uses the output coil status as a seal-in contact, directly, so that the motor contactor will continue to be energized after the "Start" pushbutton switch is released. You can see the normally-closed contact X2 appear in a colored block, showing that it is in a closed ("electrically conducting") state.

If we were to press the "Start" button, input X1 would energize, thus "closing" the X1 contact in the program, sending "power" to the Y1 "coil," energizing the Y1 output and applying 120 volt AC power to the real motor contactor coil. The parallel Y1 contact will also "close," thus latching the "circuit" in an energized state:

Now, if we release the "Start" pushbutton, the normally-open X1 "contact" will return to its "open" state, but the motor will continue to run because the Y1 seal-in "contact" continues to provide "continuity" to "power" coil Y1, thus keeping the Y1 output energized:

To stop the motor, we must momentarily press the "Stop" pushbutton, which will energize the X2 input and "open" the normally-closed "contact," breaking continuity to the Y1 "coil:"

When the "Stop" pushbutton is released, input X2 will de-energize, returning "contact" X2 to its normal, "closed" state. The motor, however, will not start again until the "Start" pushbutton is actuated, because the "seal-in" of Y1 has been lost:

An important point to make here is that fail-safe design is just as important in PLC-controlled systems as it is in electromechanical relay-controlled systems. One should always consider the effects of failed (open) wiring on the device or devices being controlled. In this motor control circuit example, we have a problem: if the input wiring for X2 (the "Stop" switch) were to fail open, there would be no way to stop the motor!

The solution to this problem is a reversal of logic between the X2 "contact" inside the PLC program and the actual "Stop" pushbutton switch:

When the normally-closed "Stop" pushbutton switch is unactuated (not pressed), the PLC's X2 input will be energized, thus "closing" the X2 "contact" inside the program. This allows the motor to be started when input X1 is energized, and allows it to continue to run when the "Start" pushbutton is no longer pressed. When the "Stop" pushbutton is actuated, input X2 will de-energize, thus "opening" the X2 "contact" inside the PLC program and shutting off the motor. So, we see there is no operational difference between this new design and the previous design.

However, if the input wiring on input X2 were to fail open, X2 input would de-energize in the same manner as when the "Stop" pushbutton is pressed. The result, then, for a wiring failure on the X2 input is that the motor will immediately shut off. This is a safer design than the one previously shown, where a "Stop" switch wiring failure would have resulted in an inability to turn off the motor.

In addition to input (X) and output (Y) program elements, PLCs provide "internal" coils and contacts with no intrinsic connection to the outside world. These are used much the same as "control relays" (CR1, CR2, etc.) are used in standard relay circuits: to provide logic signal inversion when necessary.

To demonstrate how one of these "internal" relays might be used, consider the following example circuit and program, designed to emulate the function of a three-input NAND gate. Since PLC program elements are typically designed by single letters, I will call the internal control relay "C1" rather than "CR1" as would be customary in a relay control circuit:

In this circuit, the lamp will remain lit so long as any of the pushbuttons remain unactuated (unpressed). To make the lamp turn off, we will have to actuate (press) all three switches, like this:

This section on programmable logic controllers illustrates just a small sample of their capabilities. As computers, PLCs can perform timing functions (for the equivalent of time-delay relays), drum sequencing, and other advanced functions with far greater accuracy and reliability than what is possible using electromechanical logic devices. Most PLCs have the capacity for far more than six inputs and six outputs. The following photograph shows several input and output modules of a single Allen-Bradley PLC.

With each module having sixteen "points" of either input or output, this PLC has the ability to monitor and control dozens of devices. Fit into a control cabinet, a PLC takes up little room, especially considering the equivalent space that would be needed by electromechanical relays to perform the same functions:

One advantage of PLCs that simply cannot be duplicated by electromechanical relays is remote monitoring and control via digital computer networks. Because a PLC is nothing more than a special-purpose digital computer, it has the ability to communicate with other computers rather easily. The following photograph shows a personal computer displaying a graphic image of a real liquid-level process (a pumping, or "lift," station for a municipal wastewater treatment system) controlled by a PLC. The actual pumping station is located miles away from the personal computer display:

Motion Controllers

Programmable Logic Controllers ( PLCS ) & Programmable Logic Controller


Some programmable logic controllers ( PLCS ) are equipped to solve problems involving mathematical functions such as sine, cosine, tangent, xy, y root of x, e sub x , natural logarithms, and common logarithms. Such calculations are often required for energy management, process control, process modeling, real-time error correction, and many other applications.

And while ladder logic is still the standard industry programming language for programmable logic controllers ( PLCS ), the trend is toward state logic, sequential function charts, graphics, and versions that are programmable in Basic, C, or other high-level languages.

The ability to handle analog signals along with arithmetic and other complex calculations has made programmable logic controllers ( PLCS ) suitable for the control of processes as well as for the control of machines. Typical applications for programmable logic controllers ( PLCS ) are mineral and chemical processing, water and waste treatment, and petroleum collection and distribution. In many of these applications a programmable logic controller ( PLCS ) can complement conventional analog control systems by handling sequence problems as well as a portion of the analog calculation and control. In support of those functions, some programmable logic controllers ( PLCS ) now have the ability to store recipes for batch processing, reducing the need for manual inputs.

In further support of their process-control capabilities, some programmable logic controllers ( PLCS ) can be equipped to solve complex equations such as proportional-integral-derivative equations required for the control of many processes. A sophisticated programmable logic controller ( PLCS ) is capable of performing these calculations on many different portions of a process simultaneously.

Programmable Logic Controller

First, the PLC will require a proper enclosure and output loads, such as room lights, should have their own relay panel. The relay panel is installed above or below the PLC enclosure depending on the output wiring of the PLC. Mount the PLC horizontally to provide proper ventilation. You cannot mount the PLC vertically, upside down, or on a flat horizontal surface. Provide a minimum clearance of 40mm between the PLC and all sides of the enclosure.

Remember to allow for other items, like a Lutron interface unit, to be mounted in the same PLC enclosure. There should also be at least 80mm of clearance between the PLC and wiring that runs parallel to the unit.

PLCs can be secured to an enclosure by using mounting rails. They are approximately 35mm high, with a depth of 7mm. If you mount the PLC on a rail, do consider using end brackets on each side of the PLC. The end bracket helps keep the PLC from sliding horizontally along the rail, reducing the possibility of accidentally pulling the wiring loose.

The ground terminal on the PLC must be connected to a good common ground reference (Earth ground). One method of providing an adequate common ground reference is connection to the incoming power system ground. Most PLCs have no internal fuses for the input power circuits, so external circuit protection is needed to ensure the safety of personnel and safe operation of the equipment itself. When operating the PLC from 110/125 VAC, it is only necessary to fuse the line (L) lead; it is not necessary to fuse the neutral (N) lead.

Most connections, indicators, and terminals on a PLC are located on its front panel. The communication ports are located on front of the PLC as are the option card slots and the mode selector switch.

The PLC terminals are divided into two groups. Each group has its own terminal block. The outputs and power wiring are on one block, and the input wiring is on the other. In some instances, it may be desirable to remove the terminal block for easy wiring. The terminal block is designed for easy removal with just a small screwdriver. Minimum wire sizes, color coding, and general safety practices should comply with appropriate electrical codes and standards for your area. Each terminal connection of the PLC can accept one 16 AWG wire or two 18 AWG size wire. Avoid running DC wiring close to AC wiring where possible.

The PLC systems are designed to be powered by 110/125 VAC. Electrical power in some areas where the PLCs are installed is not always stable and storms can cause power surges. Due to this, powerline filters are recommended for protecting the PLCs from power surges.

Evaluate any installations where the ambient temperature may approach the lower or upper limits of the PLC specifications. If you suspect the ambient temperature will not be within the operating specification for the PLC system, measures such as installing a cooling/heating source must be taken to get the ambient temperature within the range of specifications.

TS-PLC (Embedded Programmable Logic Controller)

The TS-PLC is a microcontroller based solution for remote sensing and control in commercial and industrial applications. It incorporates a built-in custom BIOS to allow field reprogramming and upgrading. The default TS-PLC software executes a programmable logic controller model documented in the software section.

Hardware Description

The TS-PLC operates in conjunction with the TS-PLC-MASTER unit. A MASTER unit is required in order to program the TS-PLC device(s). The MASTER provides a web based interface for editing ladder logic and committing programs to TS-PLC devices. In some configurations the MASTER cannot be disconnected from the TS-PLC devices after they are programmed, but must instead remain connected to the serial network during operation of the those devices:

  • When the interface used is RS-485, and more then one TS-PLC is connected, and the TS-PLC units must communicate with each other for any reason. In this case, the TS-PLC-MASTER is required to remain connected to all units to perform the role of RS-485 master.
  • If the TS-PLC-MASTER has the RTC option, and any of the TS-PLC devices needs to use the current date or time as part of its operation. In this case, the devices that need this information must remain in communication with the MASTER in order to receive period time notifications.

The TS-PLC units and TS-PLC-MASTER can be networked (connected) across one of the following serial communications interfaces, at 115.2kbps:

  • RS-485
  • wireless radio (optional)
  • RS-232 (coming soon)
  • USB (coming soon)

The TS-PLC has a ten position industrial grade removable screw-down terminal strip for I/O connections:

PositionInput
function

name
Output
name

function
1GNDground

2ADC210-bit Analog to Digital ConvertorX+RS-485 mode only
3ADC310-bit Analog to Digital ConvertorX-RS-485 mode only
4ADC410-bit Analog to Digital ConvertorOUT4low-side switch
5ADC510-bit Analog to Digital ConvertorOUT5low-side switch
6ADC610-bit Analog to Digital ConvertorOUT6low-side switch
7ADC710-bit Analog to Digital ConvertorOUT7 high or low side switch
8ADC810-bit Analog to Digital ConvertorOUT8 high or low side switch
9VCCpower (4.7-30V DC)

10GNDground


Notes:

  • The high side switches when on will output to within about a diode drop of whatever input voltage you use, and are (cumulatively) current limited by a 400mA polyfuse.
  • The low side switches all have built-in clamp diodes so can be used to drive relays; maximum current is 200mA.
  • The TS-PLC can either be powered from the VCC input, or from USB

There are three addition I/Os which do not have connectors:

NameFunction
GLEDGreen LED
RLEDRed LED
TEMP10-bit Temperature Sensor (optional)


Programmable Logic Controller language

Overview

PLC controllers have been developed as a low cost flexible alternative to old relay logic controllers used in process and automated manufacturing control. They have numerous advantages over the relay logic systems including the lower cost, size, greater reliability and more functions than older systems. The technology that has allowed their development is the microprocessor/microchip technology. This allows for easy reprogramming of the control programs stored within the PLC memory and eliminates the need for any hardware modifications when a different control process is to be implemented. In the interest of simplicity and greater efficiency of programming a common set of programming standards and languages has been adopted across all PLC platforms.

This report focuses on the IEC 1131-3 standard and the set of four graphical and textual languages currently in use in the PLC programming.

The basic PLC system configuration and internal operation is provided, however the main focus is on the actual programming languages which are evaluated in detail. For each language the main application area is defined with the main strengths stressed, followed by a detailed account of the various instructions that are the building blocks of the programming language.

Network and Web-Managed Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) with PSU

The Networked Programmable Logic Controller (PLC-1608) has 16 Inputs and 8 Outputs


This unique PLC (Programmable Logic Controller) allows up to 16 inputs to be evaluated and up to 8 relay isolated outputs to be controlled.


Unique features include that the device can be connected directly to an Ethernet LAN. A built in web-site allows for configuration and status display of the controller thus no front panel required.

An optional A/D and D/A board allowing for 8 Analog Input and 8 Analog Output channels to be evaluated or be controlled.

Easy to understand programming language.

The controller is ideal to replace older TTL type controllers that for example controlled half automatic screen printing equipment, security access curtains, punch presses, sheers and press breaks.

But also ideal for remote control of motors, fans for factory or environmental monitoring applications.

The controller has a power supply and battery charger included which can run the controller fully functioning for up to 8 days.

A built in timer and clock which can syncronize with a timeserver, or be connected to Ringdale's Satellite Time Server keeps accurate time and can spawn actions at pre-set times.

The Ringdale PLC-1608 is ideal for solving small automation and robotics problems.

The PLC can also easily integrate into larger industrial applications and communication between devices through the network give the device unparalleled ability and flexibility.

Comes with power supply and battery charger in a rugged enclosure.

Allen Bradley MicroLogix 1500 PLC in Lookout

This document covers an example for configuring Allen Bradley MicroLogix 1500 PLC for Lookout, or Lookout Protocol Drivers using direct serial connection. This PLC uses a special cable by Allen Bradley to connect to a PC. The cable model number we are using is 1761-CBL-PM02.
1. Start Lookout and create a new object: by selecting Object >> Create.

2. Select AB_Logix from the list.


3. Configure the object properties using the exact communication settings from the proprietary software (the image below correspond to a specific PLC configuration, your settings may be different). Click OK when you are done.


4. At this point, the PLC should be configured in Lookout and you can access its object data members.

For an example of how to access Lookout object data members, refer to the tutorial in Accessing Lookout Object Datamembers.

If you need help in accessing the PLC from the LabVIEW DSC module, refer to the document Connecting LabVIEW OPC Client through DataSocket connection.

For more information about AB_Logix object data members, please consult the Lookout Help.

Refer to Notes on Allen Bradley PLC Addressing for more information about using the AB_Logix object.

Programmable Logic Controllers

Solutions that Set the Industry Standard

Allen-Bradley control solutions set the standard — from the invention of the programmable logic controller nearly 30 years ago to today's open and highly integrated control platforms. The reason? Our control solutions move you forward while protecting the control investment you made in the past.

Use our Controller Selector to find a platform that fits your requirements today.

You're concerned with solving key manufacturing challenges — lower costs, improved throughput, higher quality and increased flexibility. We offer highly integrated control solutions to assure that

your control system will be available to solve those challenges.

The benefit to you comes in time savings, cost savings and faster start-ups that result from pre-integrated products designed to work together as well as from services available to you from initial conception to ongoing maintenance.

Programmable Logic Controllers

I2S Uses CompactRIO to Optimize PLC Automation in Steel Rolling Mills

At Intergrated Industrial Systems (I2S), we have used programmable logic controllers (PLCs) for years to automate our rolling mills. To increase the efficiency and quality of our steel mills, we implemented a gamma gauging system to more accurately control the thickness of metal. Within these systems, we use a gamma ray sensor that requires high-speed, accurate analog I/O along with advanced processing to convert the signal from the sensor to metal thickness. Unfortunately, the PLCs used to automate the rolling mills do not provide the high-speed analog I/O and processing required.

The NI CompactRIO PAC provided the reliability and ruggedness of a PLC for the harsh environment and critical nature of the control system, along with the high-speed analog I/O and signal processing capabilities we required. The analog input modules in CompactRIO connect to gamma-based thickness sensors so we can customize the I/O rates and synchronization with the embedded field-programmable gate array (FPGA) of CompactRIO. The data received from the sensors is then processed in the CompactRIO real-time processor using built-in National Instruments LabVIEW Real-Time function blocks to convert the data from the sensors to an accurate thickness measurement. The data is then transmitted over Ethernet to networked PLCs. With its embedded FPGA and real-time processor, CompactRIO can perform all of the I/O and signal processing and insert a high-accuracy thickness measurement into Ethernet packets without slowing down the PLC control loop.

With NI LabVIEW graphical programming tools, we quickly programmed the FPGA and real-time processor in CompactRIO. Because CompactRIO and our PLCs are Ethernet based, we successfully integrated the CompactRIO PAC with our control systems to optimize our rolling mills with minimal changes to our existing control architecture.

Replacing a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) with LabVIEW and FieldPoint for Composting Plant Automation

Introduction
Our project involved automating a large rail crane, inside a large hall, for composting mushroom substrate. The crane has to operate overnight without operators or human supervision, so reliability of the system is of prime concern. System design must also be of maximum user friendliness and adaptability. The length of the hall is 80 m, the width 12 m, and the depth 5 m. The crane, which has a lifting capacity of 3 tons, has four axes of movement (horizontal along and across, vertical up/down, and opening/closing of the fork).
The raw materials are delivered at one end of the hall, then mixed and arranged into heaps along the wide side of the hall. The crane then automatically turns these heaps overnight. It removes a compost heap piece by piece and rebuilds a new heap adjacent to the old one. This turning is necessary for making a homogenous substrate, watering all of the substrate equally, and keeping the process aerobic at all times. Through this method, the compost moves forward heap by heap, night after night, along the hall. After one week, it is sufficiently fermented to pass onto the next stage and is moved to the other end of the hall.

In the course of the project, we replaced an existing but outdated Siemens S5 PLC with a more modern system. Our initial evaluation showed that there is no software compatibility between this type of PLC and the current products from the same vendor. Because this meant a complete software rewrite in any case, we decided to do a more in-depth evaluation of systems on the market. Changing to a new system also gave us the opportunity to implement more functionality, making automatic crane operation more reliable.
We found that there has been surprisingly little evolution in the PLC domain for many years and that their simple architecture (single-task, circular program execution, no encapsulation of data, low-level programming language, etc) makes the creation of a large control program for today’s complex demands very difficult and time-consuming. In addition, the resulting code is difficult to understand and maintain.

System Architecture
Considering the severe disadvantages of the traditional PLC, we decided to write the entire application in G using LabVIEW because this program effectively overcomes the shortcomings of traditional PLC systems. The application runs on a Pentium III PC with 450 MHz under Windows NT 4. For the I/O hardware, we chose a FieldPoint system because it is relatively inexpensive compared to other possible hardware systems and can deal directly with the 24 V signals commonly used in automation. The control system for the rail crane has about 200 digital I/O points consisting of two racks of FieldPoint modules. An extension to automate the rest of the composting machinery in the same way is currently underway, so the system will ultimately control about 400 I/O points.

To our knowledge, this application is one of the first where such a pure, PC-based system completely replaces a PLC (there are "Soft-PLC" solutions on the market, but except for the hardware platform, they are not really different from a normal PLC).Initially, we had some concerns about the time behavior predictability of such a system. Our requirement for the response time is about 100 ms, which is equal or superior to PLC systems. Our experience shows that the LabVIEW application paired with FieldPoint can easily and reliably meet this need, even while using RS-232 communication (the Ethernet communication now used is still much faster).

One single task is reading and writing to and from the FieldPoint hardware. All other tasks interface to the crane through this communication via arrays. This is done to avoid a possible resource contention. For instance, if several tasks access the hardware simultaneously, this could then lead to a timing behavior, which is difficult to predict.

System Implementation
The software is divided into several distinct parts - the first is the basic control of the four axes movements (e.g. move to a certain position, close the fork, etc.), plus the control of all the auxiliary systems. This layer is always active in automatic as well as manual mode. We can control this system from the PC, from the main control panel, and via the "joystick" controls next to the crane itself. Second, we implemented completely automated procedures such that the crane can perform the mixing operation overnight without operator supervision (removal of the compost heaps and rebuilding them adjacently).

The third part of the software is the automatic error recovery functions. In our case, this is particularly important because the composting hall is a difficult environment where abnormal conditions can occur. For example, the crane can get stuck; the wheels can slip on the rails; the fork cannot close because it is too full; the crane cannot lift up because the load is too heavy, and so on. The system software must be designed to take such conditions into account and also have the ability to resolve them automatically (e.g. jiggle the crane forward and backward to make it move again; open the fork a bit, and shake off excess load etc.)
The fourth part are the visualization functions, which form an integrated part of the application. While the first part (the basic control) could be implemented with a PLC, it would be very difficult to implement the other parts with a PLC system. Many of today’s automation problems are not limited to simple control tasks, but rather complex processes that must run fully automatically. Modern systems of this type are also expected to imitate the behavior of a human operator in abnormal conditions and react "intelligently" in order to keep the necessary human intervention to an absolute minimum.

Conclusion
The LabVIEW/BridgeVIEW family is very well suited for automation applications. These platforms can replace a PLC in all aspects; in particular, the time response of these systems also easily meets or exceeds those of a PLC. In PLC-based systems, there will always be an artificial break between the control part and the higher functions such as visualization, statistics etc; which are programmed completely differently and run on different platforms.

In LabVIEW, all aspects of an automation solution of any complexity can be seamlessly integrated and programmed directly. These parts include the control functions, process automation, error recovery functions, visualization, database integration, statistics, and so on. Software engineers can write the entire application with one tool as opposed to using several.

Power line communication

High-frequency communication (≥MHz)

High frequency communication may (re)use large portions of the radio spectrum for communication, or may use select (narrow) band(s), depending on the technology.

Home networking (broadband)

Power line communications can also be used to interconnect home computers, peripherals or other networked consumer peripherals, although there is not yet a universal standard for this type of application. Standards for power line home networking have been developed by a number of different companies within the framework of the HomePlug Powerline Alliance and the Universal Powerline Association.

Internet access (broadband over powerlines

Broadband over power lines (BPL), also known as power-line Internet or powerband, is the use of PLC echnology to provide broadband Internet access through ordinary power lines. A computer (or any other device) would need only to plug a BPL "modem" into any outlet in an equipped building to have high-speed Internet access.

BPL may offer benefits over regular cable or DSL connections: the extensive infrastructure already available appears to allow people in remote locations to access the Internet with relatively little equipment investment by the utility. Also, such ubiquitous availability would make it much easier for other electronics, such as televisions or sound systems, to hook up.

But variations in the physical characteristics of the electricity network and the current lack of IEEE[1] standards mean that provisioning of the service is far from being a standard, repeatable process. And, the amount of bandwidth a BPL system can provide compared to cable and wireless is in question. The prospect of BPL could motivate DSL and cable operators to more quickly serve rural communities.

PLC modems transmit in medium and high frequency (1.6 to 80 MHz electric carrier). The asymmetric speed in the modem is generally from 256 kbit/s to 2.7 Mbit/s. In the repeater situated in the meter room the speed is up to 45 Mbit/s and can be connected to 256 PLC modems. In the medium voltage stations, the speed from the head ends to the Internet is up to 135 Mbit/s. To connect to the Internet, utilities can use optical fiber backbone or wireless link.

The system has a number of issues. The primary one is that power lines are inherently a very noisy environment. Every time a device turns on or off, it introduces a pop or click into the line. Energy-saving devices often introduce noisy harmonics into the line. The system must be designed to deal with these natural signaling disruptions and work around them.

Broadband over power lines has developed faster in Europe than in the United States due to a historical difference in power system design philosophies. Power distribution uses step-down transformers to reduce the voltage for use by customers. But BPL signals cannot readily pass through transformers, as their high inductance makes them act as low-pass filters, blocking high-frequency signals. So, repeaters must be attached to the transformers. In the U.S., it is common for a small transformer hung from a utility pole to service a single house or a small number of houses. In Europe, it is more common for a somewhat larger transformer to service 10 or 100 houses. For delivering power to customers, this difference in design makes little difference for power distribution. But for delivering BPL over the power grid in a typical U.S. city requires an order of magnitude more repeaters than in a comparable European city. On the other hand, since bandwidth to the transformer is limited, this can increase the speed at which each household can connect, due to fewer people sharing the same line. One possible solution is to use BPL as the backhaul for wireless communications, for instance by hanging Wi-Fi access points or cellphone base stations on utility poles, thus allowing end-users within a certain range to connect with equipment they already have. In the near future, BPL may also be used as a backhaul for WiMAX networks.

The second major issue is signal strength and operating frequency. The system is expected to use frequencies of 10 to 30 MHz, which has been used for many decades by amateur radio operators, as well as international shortwave broadcasters and a variety of communications systems (military, aeronautical, etc.). Power lines are unshielded and will act as antennas for the signals they carry, and have the potential to interfere with shortwave radio communications. Modern BPL systems use OFDM modulation, which allows to mitigate interference with radio services by removing specific frequencies used. A 2001 joint study by the ARRL and HomePlug Powerline Alliance showed that for modems using this technique "in general that with moderate separation of the antenna from the structure containing the HomePlug signal that interference was barely perceptible" and interference only happened when the "antenna was physically close to the power lines".

Much faster transmissions using microwave frequencies transmitted via a surface wave propagation mechanism called E-Line have been demonstrated using only a single power line conductor. These systems have shown the potential for symmetric and full duplex communication well in excess of 1 Gbit/s in each direction. Multiple WiFi channels with simultaneous analog television in the 2.4 and 5.3 GHz unlicensed bands have been demonstrated operating over a single medium voltage line. And, because it can operate anywhere in the 100 MHz - 10 GHz region, this technology can completely avoid the interference issues associated with use of shared spectrum while offering flexibility for modulation and protocols of a microwave system.

Medium frequency (kHz)

Home control (narrowband)

Power line communications technology can use the household electrical power wiring as a transmission medium. INSTEON and X10 are the two most popular[unreliable source?], de factohome automation for remote control of lighting and appliances without installation of additional control wiring. standards using power line communications for home control. This is a technique used in

Typically home-control power line communication devices operate by modulating in a carrier wavekHz into the household wiring at the transmitter. The carrier is modulated by digital signals. Each receiver in the system has an address and can be individually commanded by the signals transmitted over the household wiring and decoded at the receiver. These devices may be either plugged into regular power outlets, or permanently wired in place. Since the carrier signal may propagate to nearby homes (or apartments) on the same distribution system, these control schemes have a "house address" that designates the owner. of between 20 and 200

Since 1999, a new power-line communication technology "universal powerline bus" has been developed, using pulse-position modulation (PPM). The physical layer method is a very different scheme than the modulated/demodulated RF techniques used by X-10. The promoters claim advantages in cost per node, and reliability.

Low-speed narrow-band communication

Narrowband power line communications began soon after electrical power supply became wide-spread. Around the year 1922 the first carrier frequency systems began to operate over high-tension lines with frequencies of 15 to 500 kHz for telemetry purposes, and this continues.[2][3] Consumer products such as baby alarms have been available at least since 1940.

In the 1930s, ripple carrier signalling was introduced on the medium (10-20 kV) and low voltage (240/415V) distribution systems. For many years the search continued for a cheap bi-directional technology suitable for applications such as remote meter reading. For example, the Tokyo Electric Power Co ran experiments in the 1970s which reported successful bi-directional operation with several hundred units.[4] Since the mid-1980s, there has been a surge of interest in using the potential of digital communications techniques and digital signal processing. The drive is to produce a reliable system which is cheap enough to be widely installed and able to compete cost effectively with wireless solutions. But the narrowband powerline communications channel presents many technical challenges. A mathematical channel model and a survey of work can be found in reference no. 5[5].

Applications of mains communications vary enormously, as would be expected of such a widely available medium. One natural application of narrow band power line communication is the control and telemetry of electrical equipment such as meters, switches, heaters and domestic appliances. A number of active developments are considering such applications from a systems point of view, such as 'Demand Side Management'.[6] In this, domestic appliances would intelligently co-ordinate their use of resources, for example limiting peak loads.

Control and telemetry applications include both 'utility side' applications, which involves equipment belonging to the utility company (i.e. between the supply transformer substation up to the domestic meter), and 'consumer-side' applications which involves equipment in the consumer's premises. Possible utility-side applications include automatic meter reading(AMR), dynamic tariff control, load management, load profile recording, credit control, pre-payment, remote connection, fraud detection and network management, [7] and could be extended to include gas and water.

A project of EDF, France includes demand side management, street lighting control, remote metering and billing, customer specific tariff optimisation, contract management, expense estimation and gas applications safety [8].

There are also many specialised niche applications which use the mains supply within the home as a convenient data link for telemetry. For example, in the UK and Europe a TV audience monitoring system uses powerline communications as a convenient data path between devices that monitor TV viewing activity in different rooms in a home and a data concentrator which is connected to a telephone modem.

The most robust low-speed powerline technology uses DCSK technology available from Yitran Communications[dubious ]. Renesas Technology licenses this know-how from Yitran and incorporates it in the single chip MCU + PLC family of devices known as M16C/6S. Renesas also licenses a state of the art network layer for AMR/AMM applications which can run on these devices.

High-speed narrow-band powerline communication - distribution line carrier

DLC uses existing electrical distribution network in the medium voltage (MV) — i.e., 11 kV, Low Voltage (LV) as well as building voltages. It is very similar to the powerline carrier. DLC uses narrowband powerline communication frequency range of 9 to 500 kHz with data rate up to 576 kbit/s. DLC is suitable (even in very large networks) for multiple realtime energy management applications. It can be implemented under REMPLI System as well as SCADA, AMR and Power Quality Monitoring System. DLC complies with the following standards: EN 50065 (CENELEC), IEC 61000-3 and FCC Part 15 Subpart B.

There are no interference issues with radio users or electromagnetic radiation. With external inductive or capacitive coupling, a distance more than 15 km can be achieved over a medium voltage network. On low voltage networks, a direct connection can be made since the DLC has a built-in capacitive coupler. This allows end-end communications from substation to the customer premises without repeaters.

The latest DLC systems significantly improve upon and differ from other powerline communication segments. DLC is mainly useful for last-mile and backhaul instrastucture that can be integrated with corporate wide area networks (WANs) via TCP/IP, serial communication or leased-line modem to cater for multi-services realtime energy management systems.

Transmitting radio programs

Sometimes PLC was used for transmitting radio programs over powerlines. When operated in the AM radio band, it is known as a carrier current system. Such devices were in use in Germany, where it was called Drahtfunk, and in Switzerland, where it was called Telefonrundspruch, and used telephone lines. In the USSR PLC was very common for broadcasting since 1930s years because of its cheapness and accessible. In Norway the radiation of PLC systems from powerlines was sometimes used for radio supply. These facilities were called Linjesender. In all cases the radio programme was fed by special transformers into the lines. To prevent uncontrolled propagation, filters for the carrier frequencies of the PLC systems were installed in substations and at line branches.

An example of the programs carried by "wire broadcasting" in Switzerland:

  • 175 kHz Swiss Radio International
  • 208 kHz RSR1 "la première" (French)
  • 241 kHz "classical music"
  • 274 kHz RSI1 "rete UNO" (Italian)
  • 307 kHz DRS1 (German)
  • 340 kHz "easy music"

Utility applications

Utility companies use special coupling capacitors to connect medium-frequency radio transmitters to the power-frequency AC conductors. Frequencies used are in the range of 24 to 500 kHz, with transmitter power levels up to hundreds of watts. These signals may be impressed on one conductor, on two conductors or on all three conductors of a high-voltage AC transmission line. Several PLC channels may be coupled onto one HV line. Filtering devices are applied at substations to prevent the carrier frequency current from being bypassed through the station apparatus and to ensure that distant faults do not affect the isolated segments of the PLC system. These circuits are used for control of switchgear, and for protection of transmission lines. For example, a protection relay can use a PLC channel to trip a line if a fault is detected between its two terminals, but to leave the line in operation if the fault is elsewhere on the system.

While utility companies use microwave and now, increasingly, fiber optic cables for their primary system communication needs, the power-line carrier apparatus may still be useful as a backup channel or for very simple low-cost installations that do not warrant installing fiber optic lines.

Low frequency (

Power line carrier systems have long been a favorite at many utilities because it allows them to reliably move data over an infrastructure that they control. Many technologies are capable of performing multiple applications. For example, a communication system bought initially for automatic meter reading can sometimes also be used for load control or for demand response applications.

PLC is one of the technologies used in the automatic meter reading industry. Both one-way and two-way systems have been successfully used for decades. Interest in this application has grown substantially in recent history -- not so much because there is an interest in automating a manual process, but because there is an interest in obtaining fresh data from all metered points in order to better control and operate the system. PLC is one of the technologies being used in Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) systems.

In a one-way (inbound only) system, readings "bubble up" from end devices (i.e. meters), through the communication infrastructure, to a "master station" which publishes the readings. A one-way system might be lower-cost than a two-way system, but also is difficult to reconfigure should the operating environment change.

In a two-way system (supporting both outbound and inbound), commands can be broadcast out from the master station to end devices (meters) -- allowing for reconfiguration of the network, or to obtain readings, or to convey messages, etc. The device at the end of the network may then respond (inbound) with a message that carries the desired value. Outbound messages injected at a utility substation will propagate to all points downstream. This type of broadcast allows the communication system to simultaneously reach many thousands of devices -- all of which are known to have power, and have been previously identified as candidates for load shed. PLC also may be a component of a smart power grid.

Standards organizations

Several competing standards are evolving including the HomePlug Powerline Alliance, Universal Powerline Association, European Telecommunications Standards Institute, and the IEEE. It is unclear which standard will come out ahead. X10 is a de facto standard also used by RadioShack's Plug'n'Power system. In 2006 the ITU-T began work on G.hn, a new home networking standard for operation over powerline, coax and phonewires.

  • IEEE produces standards for several types of power line communications systems.
    • IEEE 643-2004 "Guide for Power-Line Carrier Applications" is a standard for communication over the transmission line network (above 69kV).
    • IEEE P1675 "Standard for Broadband over Power Line Hardware" is a working group working on hardware installation and safety issues.
    • IEEE P1775 "Powerline Communication Equipment - Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Requirements - Testing and Measurement Methods" is a working group focused on PLC equipment, electromagnetic compatibility requirements, and testing and measurement methods.
    • IEEE P1901 "IEEE P1901 Draft Standard for Broadband over Power Line Networks: Medium Access Control and Physical Layer Specifications" is a working group for delivering broadband over power lines. The aim is to define medium access control and physical layer specifications for all classes of BPL devices - from long distance connections to those within subscriber premises. Many companies and standard bodies are participating in the developing IEEE P1901 standard including HomePlug Powerline Alliance, UPA, CEPCA and OPERA; this means a good chance for a unified power line communication standard in the future. Launch is expected in 2008.
    • IEEE BPL Study Group — "Standardization of Broadband Over Power Line Technologies" drove the creation of the BPL related P1901 working groups. It still meets time-to-time looking to create new working groups if needed. website
  • LonWorks powerline communication is used world-wide, for example for Home Automation, Street Lighting, Energy Management and Utility Metering. Related standards can be found on [4]
  • OPERA (Open PLC European Research Alliance) is a R&D Project with funding from the European Commission. It aims to improve the existing systems, develop PLC service, and standardise systems.
  • POWERNET is a R&D Project with funding from the European Commission. It aims to develop and validate a ‘plug and play’ Cognitive Broadband over Power Lines (CBPL) communications equipment that meet the regulatory requirements concerning electro-magnetic radiations and can deliver high data rates while using with low transmit power spectral density and working at low signal to noise ratio.

Broadband over power line (BPL)

Potential for interference

Power and telecommunications companies have started tests of the BPL technology, over the protests of the radio groups. After claims of interference by these groups, many of the trials were ended early and proclaimed successes, though the ARRL and other groups claimed otherwise. Some of the providers conducting those trials have now begun commercial roll-outs in limited neighborhoods in selected cities, with some level of user acceptance. There have been many documented cases of interference reported to the FCC by Amateur Radio users. Because of these continued problems, Amateur Radio operators and others filed a petition for reconsideration with the FCC in February 2005. Austria, Australia, New Zealand and other locations have also experienced BPL's spectrum pollution and raised concerns within their governing bodies. In the UK, the BBC has published the results of a number of tests (The effects of PLT on broadcast reception,PLT and Broadcasting, Co-existence of PLT and Radio Services) to detect interference from BPL installations. It has also made a video (Real Media format), showing broadcast of data and interference from in-home BPL devices.

In June 2007, NATO Research and Technology Organisation released a report titled HF Interference, Procedures and Tools (RTO-TR-IST-050) which concluded that widespread deployment of BPL may have a "possible detrimental effect upon military HF radio communications and COMINT systems."

New powerline modems are able to detect the existence of SW-Radio services at the location and time of operation by monitoring the ground noise at the socket where the modem is connected. The frequencies allocated by radio broadcast will be omitted from powerline communication. Such new technologies remove interferences from powerline modems to SW-Radio broadcast.

US FCC

On October 14, 2004, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission adopted rules to facilitate the deployment of "Access BPL" -- i.e., use of BPL to deliver broadband service to homes and businesses. The technical rules are more liberal than those advanced by ARRL and other spectrum users, but include provisions that require BPL providers to investigate and correct any interference they cause. These rules may be subject to future litigation.

On August 8, 2006 FCC adopted a memorandum opinion and an order on broadband over power lines, giving the go-ahead to promote broadband service to all Americans.[9][10] The order rejects calls from aviation, business, commercial, amateur radio and other sectors of spectrum users to limit or prohibit deployment until further study is completed. FCC chief Kevin Martin said that "holds great promise as a ubiquitous broadband solution that would offer a viable alternative to cable, digital subscriber line, fiber, and wireless broadband solutions", and that BPL was one of the agency's "top priorities".[11]

New FCC rules require BPL systems to be capable of remotely notching out frequencies on which interference occurs, and of shutting down remotely if necessary to resolve the interference. BPL systems operating within FCC Part 15 emissions limits may still interfere with wireless radio communications and are required to resolve interference problems. A few early trials have been shut down [5][6], though whether it was in response to complaints is debatable.

The ARRL sued the FCC, claiming that the FCC violated the Administrative Procedure Act in creating its rules. On April 25, 2008, a US Court of Appeals agreed with the ARRL that the FCC violated the APA, especially by redacting data from the public that could have shed doubt on the FCC's decision.

"It is one thing for the Commission to give notice and make available for comment the studies on which it relied in formulating the rule while explaining its non-reliance on certain parts", D.C. Circuit Judge Judith Rogers wrote. "It is quite another thing to provide notice and an opportunity for comment on only those parts of the studies that the Commission likes best."[12]

Deployment

The following deployments are thought to be active as of December 2007:

  • Egypt: Engineering Office for Integrated Projects (EOIP) has deployed widely PLC technology in Alexandria, Fayed, and Tanta. Based on local developed system, the company provides AMR for electricity utilities. Currently the company has about 70,000 subscribers.
  • Russian Federation: Electro-com has deployed widely BPL/PLC technology and offers Internet, telephone, and television services in Moscow, Nizhny Novgorod, and Krasnodar, and plans to extend coverage to main Russian cities. Based on DefiDev equipments with DS2 chipset, the company provides 512 Kbit/s (400 RUB), 1 Mbit/s (500 RUB), and up to 100 Mbit/s (750 RUB, =US$29) of different qualities of plug&play services for subscribers. The company has 35,000 subscribers and an annual growth of 15-20%, according to the financial newspaper Kommersant on 21 September 2007. The company has however halted operations in Moscow in September 2008 having sold its clinet network to an ISDL internet provider [13]
  • Sweden: Vattenfall is using PLC technology at 1200 baud for automatic meter reading based on an Iskraemeco product. [7]
  • South Africa: Goal Technology Solutions (GTS) trialled the technology and is offering service in the suburbs of Pretoria, and plans to extend it to other areas. The tests were done with Mitsubishi equipment using a DS2 chipset, and the company claims a maximum throughput of 90 Mbit/s although initially only "512ADSL equivalent speeds" are available. Now it uses DefiDev's equipment and according to GTS's website, it will expand available bandwidth up to 5-20 Mbit/s.
  • Canada, Quebec: 2005 PLC communication technology developed by Ariane Controls is being installed inside and outside existing building to control lights and other energy-hungry devices. The cheap devices allow energy consumption to be better managed, and so save much energy and bring a clear return on investments.
  • United States: The United Telecom Council publishes the FCC-mandated Interference Resolution Web site, which provides a list of all BPL deployments in the US.
    • Virginia: In October 2005, the city of Manassas began the first wide-scale deployment of BPL service in the nation, offering 10 Mbit/s service for under $30 USD per month to its 35,000 city residents, using MainNet BPL technology.
    • On June 16, 2006 FCC directed the Manassas BPL System to resolve Amateurs' interference complaints. The FCC minced no words in detailing what it wants the city and BPL operator COMTek to do to ensure its system complies with Part 15 rules governing BPL systems and even hinted that it may shut down all or part of the system. [8]
    • BPL vendors such as Ambient Corporation, Amperion Inc., Current Technologies LLC, Corinex Communications, IBEC Inc., and InovaTech have deployed BPL systems in limited areas. Duke Energy has entered into $11 million contract to deploy Ambient Corporation's BPL over its systems - as of April 1, 2008: http://biz.yahoo.com/e/080403/abtg.ob8-k.html
    • California approved a plan on April 27, 2006 allowing high-speed internet providers to begin testing delivery of online access using power lines in the state.[14]
    • Duke Energy entered into $11 million contract to deploy Ambient Corporation's BPL over their systems - as of April 1, 2008.[9]
  • Asia Pacific and Oceania: InovaTech has been particularly active, with many successful trials in Australia, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Philippines. InovaTech recently widened its focus to include Europe, the Middle East and Africa, where it has undertaken several successful field trials and is believed to readying commercial operations in several locations. InovaTech is also understood to have a long term trial running in Russia. One of the most active solution providers, InovaTech is the first vendor to develop an integrated offering which integrates telecommunications and energy management capabilities.
  • Romania: In January 2006, the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology introduced a PLC trial in the rural locality of Band, Mureş County, offering phone and broadband internet access for €7 per month. The technology was introduced to 50 households. If successful, the technology will be extended to other rural areas throughout Romania.[10]
  • Hungary: The first Powerline service in Hungary was realized in September 2003 in the Riverside apartment house in Budapest by 23Vnet Ltd. The PLC equipments were supplied by ASCOM Powerline. After 4 months the service was counting 100 users from 450 apartment owners. The bandwidth is 4.5 Mbit/s. [11]
  • Saudi Arabia: ElectroNet has been working with the Saudi Electric Company since 2005 on a pilot project using broadband over power lines over medium voltage cables and linking into a low voltage distribution within a shopping mall. The pilot project also integrates automatic meter readers. [12]
    • Saudi Arabian Computer Management Consultants (SACMAC) has signed a deal to become an official system Integrator and Distributor for Mitsubishi PLC. It is expected to become a great success, because the existing broadband service, monopolized by the Saudi Telecom Company, is expensive and has poor customer service (some clients report that company techs arrive months after ordering). SACMAC has declined to talk about specifics of availability and price but says it will start rolling out the service in a few months (as of May 2006) and its price will be lower than current broadband providers.
  • Ghana
    • Cactel Communications Ltd successfully deployed an MV solution pilot in the Graphic Communications Group in Accra in June 2005. A REMS pilot for the Electricity company of Ghana (ECG) and is running a 40-user pilot at the University of Ghana in Legon. The current pilot combines fiber, radio link, Wi-fi and PLC to provide broadband internet access and telephony. It showcases the inter-operability of PLC technology and the company's expertise in emerging market design and deployment. Cactel hopes to deploy nationally, and is in deliberations with the national stakeholders and with Ghana's Ministry of Communications (MoC).[13].
    • AllTerra Communications successfully implemented a pilot test of broadband over power lines in Akosombo. In partnership with VRA, this test involves demonstrating transmission of broadband from medium to low voltage signals. AllTerra is working with VRA to expand the pilot to include essential grid management utilities that will help balance and manage the current electricity transmission throughout their various substations. Using IT as a catalyst for economic development, AllTerra is expanding into numerous areas throughout Ghana. [14]
  • Philippines is deploying broadband over power lines nationwide.[15][16]

Concluded deployments

The following deployments have ended:

  • Australia, Tasmania: In November 2007, electricity retailer Aurora Energy ended its involvement with BPL and announced it was switching to Optical Fiber.[17] This ended their commercial trial begun in September 2005, offering BPL services to 500 homes in the suburb of Tolmans Hill near Hobart, which had followed a successful technological trial earlier that year.[18]
  • Portugal ended BPL/PLC deployments in the country in October 2006, reportedly for economic reasons. [15], [16], [17]
  • Russian Federation: In September 2008, Russia's only BPL provider Electro-com ended deployments in Moscow for economic reasons.

[18]

  • United States: As of April 2007, Motorola has shuttered its Powerline LV Access BPL and reportedly plans to re-purpose the technology to a new system called Powerline MU, which is for use within multiple-unit dwellings. Motorola's system uses only residential-side low-voltage power lines for transmission to reduce the antenna effect, and successfully demonstrated frequency-notching for reduced potential for interference over the Amperion Inc. and Current Technologies LLC systems. Motorola invited the American Radio Relay League to participate with these tests, and even installed the Motorola system at their headquarters. Preliminary results were very positive with regard to interference, because the Motorola system does not use BPL on the powerlines leading up to the neighborhood. The BPL carrier is only used for the last leg of the trip from the pole to the house, and gets the signal to the pole via radio. This limits the interference to the area surrounding the last leg to the house.
    • The following other BPL deployments in the US are dismantled as of May 2008:[19]
Location Electric provider Equipment Service provider Reference (if not [20])
AL, Hoover (and other cities) Southern Company Various

AZ, Cottonwood Arizona Power Systems (APS) Mitsubishi

CA, Menlo Park Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) Main.net

CA, Rosemead Southern California Edison (SCE) Current Technologies

CA, San Diego San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) Various

CT, Shelton United Illuminating Amperion

FL, Graceville West Florida Electric Cooperative Ascom

FL, Miami Florida Power and Light Amperion and Main.net

GA, Clarksville Habersham EMC Mitsubishi

GA, Douglasville Greystone Power Mitsubishi

GA, Young, Harris The Sphigler Group Main.net

HI, Honolulu Honolulu Electric Company Current Technologies

IA, Cedar Rapids Alliant Energy Amperion

ID, Boise IDACorp Various

IN, Liberty Whitewater RMEMC Corinex

MD, Hughesville Southern Maryland Electric Company Current Technologies

MD, Potomac PEPCO Current Technologies

MN, Rochester Rochester Public Utilities Main.net

MO, Lees, Summit Aquila Amperion

NC, Raleigh Progress Energy Amperion

NY, Penn Yan Penn Yan Power and Light Amperion

PA, Allentown Pennsylvania Power and Light Main.net and Amperion

TN, Fayetteville Fayetteville Public Utilities Grid Stream

TX, Dallas Oncor Electric Delivery Company Current
AP
TX, Austin Austin Electric Energy Corinex

TX, Flatonia Broadband Horizons Unknown

TX, Weimar Fayette Electric Cooperative PowerWan

VA, Roanoke American Electric Power Mitsubishi

WA, Wenatchee Heights, Chelan County PUD Gridstream

Automotive uses

Power-line technology enables in-vehicle network communication of data, voice, music and video signals by digital means over direct current (DC) battery power-line. Advanced digital communication techniques tailored to overcome hostile and noisy environment are implemented in a small size silicon device. One power line can be used for multiple independent networks. The benefits would be lower cost and weight (compared to separate power and control wiring), flexible modification, and ease of installation. Potential problems in vehicle applications would include the higher cost of end devices, which must be equipped with active controls and communication, and the possibility of intereference with other radio frequency devices in the vehicle or other places.

Prototypes are successfully operational in vehicles, using automotive compatible protocols such as CAN-bus, LIN-bus over power line (DC-LIN) and [DC-bus][20]. [21] [22]

Failure Scenarios

There are many ways in which the communication signal may have error introduced into it. Interference, cross chatter, some active devices, and some passive devices all introduce noise or attenuation into the signal. When error becomes significant the devices controlled by the unreliable signal may fail, become inoperative, or operate in an undesirable fashion.

  1. Interference: Interference from nearby systems can cause signal degradation as the modem may not be able to determine a specific frequency among many signals in the same bandwidth.
  2. Signal Attenuation by Active Devices: Devices such as relays, transistors, and rectifiers create noise in their respective systems, increasing the likelihood of signal degradation.
  3. Signal Attenuation by Passive Devices: Transformers and DC-DC converters attenuate the input frequency signal almost completely. "Bypass" devices become necessary for the signal to be passed on to the receiving node. A bypass device may consist of three stages, a filter in series with a protection stage and coupler, placed in parallel with the passive device.

See also

References

  1. ^ Denis Du Bois (2004-12-09). "Broadband over Powerlines (BPL) in a Nutshell" (HTML), energypriorities.com. Retrieved on 2008-05-27.
  2. ^ K Dostert, 1997, Telecommunications over the Power Distribution Grid- Possibilities and Limitations Proc 1997 Internat. Symp. on Power Line Comms and its Applications pp1-9
  3. ^ R Broadridge `Power line modems and networks' 4’th International Conference on Metering Applications and Tariffs for Electricity Supply IEE conf. Publ 300 1984 pp 294-296 (London UK: IEE)
  4. ^ M Hosono et al, Improved Automatic meter reading and load control system and its operational achievement, 4th international conference on metering, apparatus and tariffs for electricity supply pp 90-94, 26-28 October 1982, IEE
  5. ^ D Cooper, T Jeans, Narrowband, Low Data Rate Communications on the Low-Voltage Mains in the CENELEC Frequencies- Part I: Noise and Attenuation, IEEE Trans on Power Delivery, vol 17 no 3 July 2002 pp 718-723
  6. ^ J Newbury, Communication requirements and standards for low voltage mains signalling, IEEE trans. on Power Delivery, Vol 13 no 1, Jan 1998, pp 46-49
  7. ^ T J Sheppard 'Mains Communications- a practical metering system' 7th International Conference on Metering Applications and Tariffs for Electricity Supply pp 223-227 17-19 November 1992 (London UK: IEE 1992)
  8. ^ G Duval, Applications of power line carrier at Electricite de France Proc 1997 Internat. Symp. on Power Line Comms and its Applications pp76-80
  9. ^ FCC
  10. ^ Memorandum Opinion and Order on Broadband Over BPL
  11. ^ FCC chief Kevin Martin statement
  12. ^ FCC dealt setback in broadband-over-power-lines push | Tech news blog - CNET News.com
  13. ^ "The Electro-com provider terminates the attempt to develop Internet via electric sockets in Moscow" (in Russian)
  14. ^ Reardon, Marguerite (April 27, 2006). "Calif. regulators OK broadband over power line test", CNET News.com, CNET Networks. Retrieved on April 19, 2008
  15. ^ Philippine News - Manila Standard Today - Venture formed to spark ‘rural revolution’ - may08_2006
  16. ^ Manila Standard Today - Broadband project may trigger rise of Bataan - jan30_2006
  17. ^ Aurora shifts focus to fibre in telecommunications strategy
  18. ^ TasTel BPL: home of Broadband Over Powerlines
  19. ^ BPL Database and Interference Information: U.S.
  20. ^ BPL Database and Interference Information: U.S.
  21. ^ "DC-LIN Over Power line"[1]
  22. ^ Y. Koren, Y. Seri "Using LIN Over Powerline Communication to Control Truck and Trailer Backlights" - SPARC 2007 [2]
  • J. L. Blackburn (ed),Applied Protective Relaying, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (1976) Newark, New Jersey USA, no ISBN, Library of Congress Card No. 76-8060
  • X.Carcelle Les reseaux CPL, Eyrolles (2006), ISBN : 2-212-11930-5